I spent a lot of money one
year, flying out to San Francisco to take a four day writing workshop with a
famous editor. My first hope was that I would be discovered, though I'd
never admit that to anyone. My second hope was that I'd learn what was
wrong with my fiction.
Here’s what I learned about
Jenks. He was a small man with a
penchant for drinking, a fancy San Francisco house, a famous writer wife and a
profound and consuming love of reading.
After applying to the workshop, he called and talked with me, in a
detailed and thoughtful way about the two writings I had submitted. I felt special but it turns out he does that
with everyone who applies, a number I’ve now forgotten, though big enough, I remember, to
stun.
Jenks had edited an
anthology of American short stories with Raymond Carver. We were assigned to read a number of stories
from it for class discussion. It was an
impressive collection.
After discussing published work, we discussed each other's. Everyone wanted to make a good impression. Jenks
wanted a fiery conversation. But of course, everyone was being very
polite. Jenks stirred it up, attacking the story I liked best, a
period piece about a colonial girl. Jenks said it was trite, that he'd
seen a thousand such stories come across his desk, and that a writer's time is worth
more than that. A few fell in line with Jenks, irritating him even more.
"Isn't anyone going to defend it?"
One older man said that he thought the sex scene
was well done, infuriating Jenks, who declared it cliché. (Interesting to note:
In an earlier discussion, I had said another classmate’s story of a girl and a
boy falling in love while on horseback read like a Harlequin Romance.
Everyone, especially Jenks, thought my comment out of line and too
harsh.)
I casually turned my comments on the colonial girl story face down. I had read it twice, noting
how I thought her word choice so beautiful. (At the time, nothing mattered
more than word choice.) And such a powerful sex scene! But here in class,
I couldn't bring myself to say anything.
Could I have come this far and still have such bad taste that I couldn’t
see the obvious? As Jenks searched the class for someone to speak, I dipped my
eyes.
Am I remembering it wrong,
or wasn’t this the woman who had made a feminist critique of one of the stories, triggering
in Jenks an anti-politically correct rant?
Was this really a bad story, or did he have some deep-set beef against
women? Weren’t all the stories he liked best by the older men in the class? What
was his relationship with his mother?
Regardless, the writer was upset. These were the first several chapters of a
novel she was very serious about, having dedicated much time, researching, outlining, writing. I wanted to defend her, but I
feared that Jenks would think me a fool.
Fortunately, it was lunch
break. I scrawled, “I’m sorry I couldn’t
say it in class, but I still love your writing,” and I hurried over to slip it
into her hands before she bolted. Her face was hard, her
eyes red. She did not come back after
lunch.
Even so, by
my private conference time, I was feeling optimistic. The class discussion of my other story had
gone surprisingly well. Jenks had said
it was unusual and publishable. Not great, he added, but fine.
So I must have been visibly
crushed when Jenks said my other story wasn’t worth pursuing unless I
completely changed the focus, maybe turning it into a trickster story. The main character was too much of a bitch,
he said, so we don’t care about her.
“Is
this based on a real incident?”
Of course I said it wasn’t, even though it was. Jenks said that I looked disappointed. I
denied that too, saying thank you, it’s very helpful. Mostly though, I was frustrated that he
didn’t say this about the piece during our discussion on the phone before the
workshop began. If he had, I would have
reworked it or submitted something else. Of course, I had no idea how hard it is to know the most helpful thing to say and when it needs to be said.
A long time before, I had heard a piece of advice about becoming a writer that was puzzling: It's most important to be empathetic. It took me a
long time to admit that the story I submitted to Jenks was a revenge story,
that I had once worked for a woman I had no empathy for, and the result was a
bad piece of fiction.
Before we all said goodbye, Jenks suggested that the
most valuable things to come out of his workshops are the
relationships that we form with other writers. He encouraged us to stay connected and read
each other’s writings. I made a
quarter-hearted attempt to stay in touch, but I knew it wouldn’t last. Rather than bonding with the other writers, I'd spent my lunch breaks walking around San
Francisco and my evenings out with my brother and friends. I don’t remember the names of anyone in the
class. I hope that woman whose story I
really did like found a way to use Jenk’s advice as a launching point, whether
she defied his critique or embraced it.
When I came home, I was too
overwhelmed with everything I’d learned to immediately return to working on short stories. Instead I spend the summer cutting and
pasting paper. In
the fall, I put everything I had into a short story I had started before the
workshop. It’s my favorite. But I was never able to write another.